RPM Access Act
U.S. Congress · HR3108 ·
What the bill says
Introduced 2025-04-30. Latest action: Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 39 - 0.
Summary (plain-language)
Rural Patient Monitoring Access Act or the RPM Access Act This bill conditions Medicare payment for remote patient monitoring services on certain requirements. Specifically, the bill conditions payment on (1) the ability of certain health care practitioners to be available in real time to respond to any detected anomalies; (2) the use of a system that can transmit relevant data in a format that is compatible with electronic health records, as needed; and (3) the reporting of such data, as required by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), to evaluate any cost savings as a result of such services. The bill also establishes a floor for certain payment calculations with respect to such services. The CMS must report on cost savings realized and expenses incurred from the use of such services over a four-year period.
Sponsors
- David Kustoff (primary)
- Jack Bergman
- Troy Balderson
- Donald G. Davis
- Sharice Davids
- Carol D. Miller
- Mark Pocan
- Adrian Smith
- W. Gregory Steube
- Robert J. Wittman
Text versions
- Introduced in House — 2025-04-30 — XML
What analysts say
No nonpartisan analysis on file for this measure yet.
What politicians say
No linked claims or utterances yet — no one on record has cited this measure to justify a public argument.
Action History
| Date | Action |
|---|---|
| 2026-07-15 | Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held |
| 2026-07-15 | Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 39 - 0. |
| 2025-04-30 | Introduced in House |
| 2025-04-30 | Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. |
Lobbying on this bill
Showing 19 of 19 bill mentions.
Honesty note: each filer below disclosed lobbying on this bill — that much the filing tells us. But the dollar figure is their total lobbying spend for the whole quarter across all their issues, not the amount spent on this bill, and the filing never says whether they supported or opposed it.
Source: Senate LDA filings.