Systemic Risk Authority Transparency Act

U.S. Congress · HR3716 · In Committee

Progression

Timing in context

Primary sponsor's contributions received (same period)

Adjacency in time is shown for context; it is not evidence of cause. Funded ≠ false — see the methodology.

What the bill says

HR3716 · U.S. Congress · In Committee

Introduced 2025-06-04. Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.

View on Congress.gov →

Summary (plain-language)

Systemic Risk Authority Transparency Act This bill requires banking regulators to submit a report to Congress in the event of the failure of an insured depository institution that leads to a systemic risk determination by the Department of the Treasury. Regulators must report supervisory information relating to the institution, any mismanagement by the executives and the board, any shortcomings by the regulator, and recommendations to improve the safety and soundness of similarly situated institutions. This report must be made no later than 90 days after such a determination and again 210 days afterwards. The Governmental Accountability Office (GAO) must report on additional factors in its report regarding such a determination. Specifically, GAO must report on any mismanagement by the executives and board of the institution, a review of the institution's compensation practices, supervisory or regulatory shortcomings, actions taken by regulators, and other relevant information. The bill also requires this report to be made no later than 60 days after such a determination and again 180 days afterwards.

Sponsors

Text versions

  • Introduced in House — 2025-06-04 — XML
  • Reported in House — 2025-07-15 — XML
  • Engrossed in House — 2025-12-01 — XML
  • Referred in Senate — 2025-12-02 — XML

What analysts say

CBO cost estimates

  • H.R. 3716, Systemic Risk Authority Transparency Act — 2025-09-23
    H.R. 3716 would require several federal agencies to report to the Congress if federal banking regulators invoke an emergency determination known as th…

    H.R. 3716 would require several federal agencies to report to the Congress if federal banking regulators invoke an emergency determination known as the systemic risk exception. Systemic risk is the possibility that the failure of a financial business, market, or product could trigger severe financial instability in the economy. The bill would require the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), the Federal Reserve, the Government Accountability Office (GAO), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to submit information about bank supervision, regulation, management, and recommendations to improve the safety and soundness of the industry.

    Enacting H.R. 3716 would increase administrative costs for those agencies to meet the additional reporting requirements. CBO estimates that the total cost across all four agencies would be less than $500,000 over the 2025-2035 period. The budgetary treatment for those four agencies is described below:

    The operating costs for the FDIC and the OCC are classified as direct spending. The OCC collects fees from financial institutions to offset its operating costs; those fees are recorded as offsetting receipts, that is, as reductions in direct spending. CBO estimates that enacting the bill would, on net, increase direct spending by less than $500,000 over the 2025-2035 period.

    Costs incurred by the Federal Reserve reduce remittances to the Treasury, which are recorded in the budget as revenues. CBO estimates that enacting H.R. 3716 would decrease revenues by less than $500,000 over the 2025-2035 period.

    GAO’s funding is provided in annual appropriation acts. CBO estimates that implementing the bill would cost less than $500,000 over the 2025-2030 period; any related spending would be subject to the availability of appropriated funds.

    If federal financial regulators increase annual fees to offset the costs of implementing the bill, H.R. 3716 would increase the costs of an existing private-sector mandate on entities required to pay those fees. CBO estimates that the incremental cost of the mandate would be small and would fall well below the annual threshold established in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) for private-sector mandates ($206 million in 2025, adjusted annually for inflation).

    The bill contains no intergovernmental mandates as defined in UMRA.

    The CBO staff contacts for this estimate are Julia Aman (for federal costs), Nate Frentz (for revenues), and Rachel Austin (for mandates). The estimate was reviewed by H. Samuel Papenfuss, Deputy Director of Budget Analysis.

    Phillip L. Swagel

    Director, Congressional Budget Office

    Full text from cbo.gov (CBO publications are public domain).

Committee reports

What politicians say

No linked claims or utterances yet — no one on record has cited this measure to justify a public argument.

Action History

DateAction
2025-12-02Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
2025-12-01Mr. Davidson moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
2025-12-01Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H4947-4948)
2025-12-01DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 3716.
2025-12-01Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H4947)
2025-12-01On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H4947)
2025-12-01Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
2025-07-15Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 119-206.
2025-07-15Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 169.
2025-06-10Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
2025-06-10Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 51 - 0.
2025-06-04Introduced in House
2025-06-04Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

← Back to legislation