Protecting Taxpayers from Ghost Preparers Act

U.S. Congress · HR9499 · Reported

Progression

Timing in context

Primary sponsor's contributions received (same period)

Adjacency in time is shown for context; it is not evidence of cause. Funded ≠ false — see the methodology.

What the bill says

HR9499 · U.S. Congress · Reported

Introduced 2026-06-29. Latest action: Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 40 - 0.

View on Congress.gov →

Summary (plain-language)

Protecting Taxpayers from Ghost Preparers Act This bill limits the amount of time the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has to assess taxes related to fraudulent or false federal tax returns where there is no intent by the taxpayer to evade taxes. The bill also expands the types of documents for which various penalties may be imposed against tax return preparers. As background, the IRS generally has three years from the date that a tax return is filed (statute of limitations) to assess taxes owed by the taxpayer for the tax year. However, if a false or fraudulent tax return is filed with the intent to evade tax (fraud exception), then the IRS may assess taxes at any time. In Murrin v. Commissioner the U.S. Tax Court held (and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed) that the fraud exception applies when a tax return preparer places false or fraudulent entries on a tax return without the taxpayer’s knowledge. In contrast, the U.S. Court of Federal Claims held in BASR Partnership v. Commissioner that the fraud exception only applies if the taxpayer intends to evade taxes. The bill limits the fraud exception to cases in which the taxpayer intends to evade taxes. Further, under the bill, tax return preparers may be subject to penalties related to false or fraudulent documents purporting to be federal tax returns, partnership administrative adjustment requests, or partnership adjustment tracking reports. (Currently, the penalties apply if the documents are valid submissions to the IRS.)

Sponsors

Text versions

  • Introduced in House — 2026-06-29 — XML

What analysts say

No nonpartisan analysis on file for this measure yet.

What politicians say

No linked claims or utterances yet — no one on record has cited this measure to justify a public argument.

Action History

DateAction
2026-07-01Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
2026-07-01Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 40 - 0.
2026-06-29Introduced in House
2026-06-29Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

← Back to legislation