Sloan Canyon Conservation and Lateral Pipeline Act

U.S. Congress · HR972 · Enacted

What the bill says

HR972 · U.S. Congress · Enacted

Introduced 2025-02-04. Latest action: Became Public Law No: 119-91.

View on Congress.gov →

Summary (plain-language)

Sloan Canyon Conservation and Lateral Pipeline Act This act expands the boundaries of the Sloan Canyon National Conservation Area in Clark County, Nevada, and grants rights-of-way through the conservation area and other land administered by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) for the construction of a water transmission pipeline and related facilities. Specifically, the act requires the BLM to grant certain rights-of-way to the Southern Nevada Water Authority (SNWA) for the purposes of (1) performing geotechnical investigations within the rights-of-way, and (2) constructing and operating a water pipeline and related facilities. The rights-of-way may not be located through or under areas designated as wilderness, and construction of the pipeline may not permanently adversely affect surface resources within the conservation area. The BLM may place other reasonable terms and conditions on the issuance of rights-of-way as necessary to protect the conservation area’s resources. In tunneling the water pipeline, SNWA may excavate and dispose of sand, gravel, minerals, and other materials as needed. The BLM must enter into a memorandum of understanding with SNWA to identify federal land on which SNWA may dispose of such materials. The act also adds approximately 9,290 acres of land to the conservation area. This expansion of the conservation area is subject to valid existing rights (e.g., utility transmission rights), must not preclude authorized activities within existing rights-of-way or corridors, and must not preclude the BLM from authorizing new utility rights-of-way.

Sponsors

Text versions

  • Enrolled Bill — XML
  • Introduced in House — 2025-02-04 — XML
  • Reported in House — 2025-09-15 — XML
  • Engrossed in House — 2025-12-15 — XML
  • Referred in Senate — 2025-12-16 — XML

What analysts say

CBO cost estimates

  • H.R. 972, Sloan Canyon Conservation and Lateral Pipeline Act — 2025-08-28
    H.R. 972 would expand the Sloan Canyon National Conservation area in Nevada by about 9,000 acres, subject to valid existing rights. The bill also woul…

    H.R. 972 would expand the Sloan Canyon National Conservation area in Nevada by about 9,000 acres, subject to valid existing rights. The bill also would direct the Department of the Interior (DOI) to grant the Southern Nevada Water Authority rights-of-way for the construction and operation of a water pipeline and related facilities within and outside the conservation area. The rights-of-way would be provided at no cost to the water authority, subject to environmental laws, and would include the right to excavate and dispose of sand, gravel, and other materials resulting from building the water infrastructure project.

    The public land that would be added to the conservation area and used for the rights-of-way is currently withdrawn from mineral leasing, and any recreational activities that currently take place would not be affected; thus, under the bill the federal government would not forgo any receipts from those activities.

    Using information from DOI, CBO estimates that the department would collect about $90,000 in fees from the water authority for a required analysis of potential effects on endangered species in the area. Those fees are recorded in the federal budget as offsetting receipts (that is, as reductions in direct spending) and would be available to spend without further appropriation for land management activities within the conservation area. On that basis, CBO estimates that enacting the bill would have a negligible effect on net direct spending over the 2025-2035 period.

    The CBO staff contact for this estimate is Lilia Ledezma. The estimate was reviewed by H. Samuel Papenfuss, Deputy Director of Budget Analysis.

    Phillip L. Swagel

    Director, Congressional Budget Office

    Full text from cbo.gov (CBO publications are public domain).

Committee reports

What politicians say

No linked claims or utterances yet — no one on record has cited this measure to justify a public argument.

Action History

DateAction
2026-05-19Signed by President.
2026-05-19Became Public Law No: 119-91.
2026-05-12Presented to President.
2026-03-03Message on Senate action sent to the House.
2026-02-26Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources discharged by Unanimous Consent.
2026-02-26Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.
2026-02-26Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S697-699)
2025-12-16Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
2025-12-15Mr. Stauber moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.
2025-12-15Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H5875-5876)
2025-12-15DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 972.
2025-12-15DEBATE - The House resumed debate on H.R. 972.
2025-12-15Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H5875)
2025-12-15On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H5875)
2025-12-15Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
2025-09-15Reported by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 119-279.
2025-09-15Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 235.
2025-04-09Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
2025-04-09Ordered to be Reported by Unanimous Consent.
2025-02-04Introduced in House
2025-02-04Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

Lobbying on this bill

Showing 12 of 12 bill mentions.

Honesty note: each filer below disclosed lobbying on this bill — that much the filing tells us. But the dollar figure is their total lobbying spend for the whole quarter across all their issues, not the amount spent on this bill, and the filing never says whether they supported or opposed it.

Registrant (lobbying firm)ClientPeriodReported quarterly amountExtraction
PORTER GROUP, LLC CITY OF HENDERSON, NEVADA Q2 2026 $30,000 Explicit
CASSIDY & ASSOCIATES, INC. LAS VEGAS VALLEY WATER DISTRICT Q2 2026 $20,000 Explicit
CASSIDY & ASSOCIATES, INC. SOUTHERN NEVADA WATER AUTHORITY Q2 2026 $20,000 Explicit
CASSIDY & ASSOCIATES, INC. STATE OF NEVADA Q2 2026 $60,000 Explicit
CASSIDY & ASSOCIATES, INC. LAS VEGAS VALLEY WATER DISTRICT Q1 2026 $20,000 Explicit
CASSIDY & ASSOCIATES, INC. STATE OF NEVADA Q1 2026 $60,000 Explicit
PORTER GROUP, LLC CITY OF HENDERSON, NEVADA Q1 2026 $30,000 Explicit
MARCUS G. FAUST, PC CLARK COUNTY NV (OFFICE OF THE COUNTY MANAGER) Q1 2026 $40,000 Explicit
MARCUS G. FAUST, PC LAS VEGAS VALLEY WATER DISTRICT Q1 2026 $20,000 Explicit
MARCUS G. FAUST, PC SOUTHERN NEVADA WATER AUTHORITY Q1 2026 $30,000 Explicit
CASSIDY & ASSOCIATES, INC. SOUTHERN NEVADA WATER AUTHORITY Q1 2026 $20,000 Explicit
CASSIDY & ASSOCIATES, INC. STATE OF NEVADA Q1 2026 $60,000 Explicit

Source: Senate LDA filings.