CARE Act of 2025
U.S. Congress · S3145 ·
Progression
Timing in context
Primary sponsor's contributions received (same period)
Adjacency in time is shown for context; it is not evidence of cause. Funded ≠ false — see the methodology.
What the bill says
Introduced 2025-11-06. Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S7964)
Summary (plain-language)
Comprehensive Alternative Response for Emergencies Act of 2025 or the CARE Act of 2025 This bill requires the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) to test a five-year model that provides for Medicare payment for ground ambulance services that do not result in the transport of the patient. Under the model, Medicare payment may be furnished for ground ambulance services when an ambulance is dispatched in response to an emergency medical call but the ambulance does not end up transporting the patient. Payment rates under the model must generally align with the payment rates that apply when there is an actual transport. The Government Accountability Office must report on the general access of Medicare beneficiaries to emergency medical services, including the impact of the model on beneficiary access and outcomes.
Sponsors
- Susan M. Collins (primary)
- Shelley Moore Capito
- Bill Cassidy
- Christopher A. Coons
- Cindy Hyde-Smith
- James C. Justice
- Amy Klobuchar
- Andy Kim
- Peter Welch
- Sheldon Whitehouse
Text versions
- Introduced in Senate — 2025-11-06 — XML
What analysts say
No nonpartisan analysis on file for this measure yet.
What politicians say
No linked claims or utterances yet — no one on record has cited this measure to justify a public argument.
Action History
| Date | Action |
|---|---|
| 2025-11-06 | Introduced in Senate |
| 2025-11-06 | Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S7964) |
Lobbying on this bill
Showing 12 of 12 bill mentions.
Honesty note: each filer below disclosed lobbying on this bill — that much the filing tells us. But the dollar figure is their total lobbying spend for the whole quarter across all their issues, not the amount spent on this bill, and the filing never says whether they supported or opposed it.
Source: Senate LDA filings.