Sloan Canyon Conservation and Lateral Pipeline Act

U.S. Congress · S392 · In Committee

What the bill says

S392 · U.S. Congress · In Committee

Introduced 2025-02-04. Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

View on Congress.gov →

Summary (plain-language)

Sloan Canyon Conservation and Lateral Pipeline Act This bill expands the boundaries of the Sloan Canyon National Conservation Area in Clark County, Nevada, and grants rights-of-way through the conservation area and other land administered by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) for the construction of a water transmission pipeline and related facilities. Specifically, the bill requires the BLM to grant certain rights-of-way to the Southern Nevada Water Authority (SNWA) for the purposes of (1) performing geotechnical investigations within the rights-of-way, and (2) constructing and operating a water pipeline and related facilities. Rights-of-way may not be located through or under areas designated as wilderness, and construction of the pipeline may not permanently adversely affect surface resources within the conservation area. The BLM may place other reasonable terms and conditions on the issuance of rights-of-way as necessary to protect the conservation area’s resources. In tunneling the water pipeline, SNWA may excavate and dispose of sand, gravel, minerals, and other materials as needed. The BLM must enter into a memorandum of understanding with SNWA to identify federal land on which SNWA may dispose of such materials. The bill also adds approximately 9,290 acres of land to the conservation area. This expansion of the conservation area is subject to valid existing rights (e.g., utility transmission rights), must not preclude authorized activities within existing rights-of-way or corridors, and must not preclude the BLM from authorizing new utility rights-of-way.

Sponsors

Text versions

  • Introduced in Senate — 2025-02-04 — XML

What analysts say

No nonpartisan analysis on file for this measure yet.

What politicians say

No linked claims or utterances yet — no one on record has cited this measure to justify a public argument.

Action History

DateAction
2025-02-04Introduced in Senate
2025-02-04Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

Lobbying on this bill

Showing 9 of 9 bill mentions.

Honesty note: each filer below disclosed lobbying on this bill — that much the filing tells us. But the dollar figure is their total lobbying spend for the whole quarter across all their issues, not the amount spent on this bill, and the filing never says whether they supported or opposed it.

Registrant (lobbying firm)ClientPeriodReported quarterly amountExtraction
PORTER GROUP, LLC CITY OF HENDERSON, NEVADA Q2 2026 $30,000 Explicit
CASSIDY & ASSOCIATES, INC. LAS VEGAS VALLEY WATER DISTRICT Q2 2026 $20,000 Explicit
CASSIDY & ASSOCIATES, INC. SOUTHERN NEVADA WATER AUTHORITY Q2 2026 $20,000 Explicit
CASSIDY & ASSOCIATES, INC. LAS VEGAS VALLEY WATER DISTRICT Q1 2026 $20,000 Explicit
PORTER GROUP, LLC CITY OF HENDERSON, NEVADA Q1 2026 $30,000 Explicit
MARCUS G. FAUST, PC CLARK COUNTY NV (OFFICE OF THE COUNTY MANAGER) Q1 2026 $40,000 Explicit
MARCUS G. FAUST, PC LAS VEGAS VALLEY WATER DISTRICT Q1 2026 $20,000 Explicit
MARCUS G. FAUST, PC SOUTHERN NEVADA WATER AUTHORITY Q1 2026 $30,000 Explicit
CASSIDY & ASSOCIATES, INC. SOUTHERN NEVADA WATER AUTHORITY Q1 2026 $20,000 Explicit

Source: Senate LDA filings.