With respect to the requirement of clause 3(c)(3) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, a cost estimate provided by the Congressional Budget Office pursuant to section 402 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 was not made available to the Committee in time for the filing of this report. The Chairman of the Committee shall cause such estimate to be printed in the Congressional Record upon its receipt by the Committee.
To modernize Federal firearms laws to account for advancements in technology and less-than-lethal weapons, and for other purposes.
U.S. Congress · HR2189 ·
Progression
Timing in context
Primary sponsor's contributions received (same period)
Adjacency in time is shown for context; it is not evidence of cause. Funded ≠ false — see the methodology.
What the bill says
Introduced 2025-03-18. Latest action: Received in the Senate.
Summary (plain-language)
Law-Enforcement Innovate to De-Escalate Act This bill removes less-than-lethal projectile devices (e.g., certain TASERs) from regulation under the Gun Control Act. The term less-than-lethal projectile device means a device that (1) is not designed or intended to expel (and may not be readily converted to discharge) commonly used ammunition or projectiles exceeding a velocity of 500 feet per second; (2) is designed and intended to be used in a manner not likely to cause death or serious bodily injury; and (3) does not accept (and cannot be readily modified to accept) an ammunition feeding device. The bill also requires the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives to determine whether a device satisfies the definition of a less-than-lethal projectile device within 90 days of a request.
Sponsors
- Scott Fitzgerald (primary)
- Sanford D. Bishop, Jr.
- Lauren Boebert
- Joyce Beatty
- Brendan F. Boyle
- Jack Bergman
- Andy Biggs
- Tim Burchett
- Eric Burlison
- Michael Baumgartner
- Nicholas J. Begich III
- Ken Calvert
- Henry Cuellar
- Yvette D. Clarke
- J. Luis Correa
- Ben Cline
- Troy A. Carter
- Mike Carey
- Jasmine Crockett
- Elijah Crane
- Juan Ciscomani
- Donald G. Davis
- Mike Ezell
- Chuck Edwards
- Gabe Evans
- Pat Fallon
- Charles J. "Chuck" Fleischmann
- Michelle Fischbach
- Brad Finstad
- Russell Fry
- Glenn Grothman
- Josh Gottheimer
- Lance Gooden
- Michael Guest
- Marie Gluesenkamp Perez
- Laura Gillen
- Brandon Gill
- Adam Gray
- Clay Higgins
- Kevin Hern
- Ashley Hinson
- Erin Houchin
- Wesley Hunt
- Harriet M. Hageman
- Abraham J. Hamadeh
- Pat Harrigan
- Darrell Issa
- Jonathan L. Jackson
- Julie Johnson
- David Kustoff
- Young Kim
- Thomas H. Kean, Jr.
- Mike Kennedy
- Brad Knott
- John B. Larson
- Doug LaMalfa
- Laurel M. Lee
- Nick LaLota
- Nicholas A. Langworthy
- Nicole Malliotakis
- Tracey Mann
- Carol D. Miller
- Mary E. Miller
- Barry Moore
- Mariannette Miller-Meeks
- Max L. Miller
- Nathaniel Moran
- Celeste Maloy
- Ryan Mackenzie
- Tim Moore
- John J. McGuire III
- Addison P. McDowell
- Troy E. Nehls
- Robert F. Onder, Jr.
- John H. Rutherford
- Michael K. Simpson
- David Schweikert
- Marlin A. Stutzman
- Pete Stauber
- W. Gregory Steube
- Haley M. Stevens
- Hillary J. Scholten
- Derek Schmidt
- Thomas P. Tiffany
- Bennie G. Thompson
- Claudia Tenney
- Shri Thanedar
- Marc A. Veasey
- Jefferson Van Drew
- Beth Van Duyne
- Derrick Van Orden
- Gabe Vasquez
- Eugene Simon Vindman
- Robert J. Wittman
- Rudy Yakym III
- Ryan K. Zinke
Text versions
What analysts say
CBO cost estimates
-
H.R. 2189, Law-Enforcement Innovate to De-Escalate Act
— 2026-02-06
With respect to the requirement of clause 3(c)(3) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, a cost estimate provided by the Congressi…
CBO cost-estimate text quoted from the committee report on GovInfo (public domain).
Committee reports
What politicians say
No linked claims or utterances yet — no one on record has cited this measure to justify a public argument.
Action History
| Date | Action |
|---|---|
| 2026-02-24 | Received in the Senate. |
| 2026-02-12 | Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 1057. (consideration: CR H2190-2204) |
| 2026-02-12 | Rule provides for consideration of S. 1383, H.R. 2189, H.R. 261 and H.R. 3617. The resolution provides for consideration of S. 1383, H.R. 2189, H.R. 261, and H.R. 3617 under a closed rule and provides for one motion to recommit H.R. 2189, H.R. 261, and H.R. 3617, and one motion to commit S. 1383. |
| 2026-02-12 | DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 2189. |
| 2026-02-12 | The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule. |
| 2026-02-12 | Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 233 - 185 (Roll no. 70). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H2190-2191) |
| 2026-02-12 | On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 233 - 185 (Roll no. 70). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H2190-2191) |
| 2026-02-12 | Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection. |
| 2026-02-11 | Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 1057 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of S. 1383, H.R. 2189, H.R. 261 and H.R. 3617. The resolution provides for consideration of S. 1383, H.R. 2189, H.R. 261, and H.R. 3617 under a closed rule and provides for one motion to recommit H.R. 2189, H.R. 261, and H.R. 3617, and one motion to commit S. 1383. |
| 2026-02-09 | Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 1042 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2189, H.R. 261 and H.R. 3617. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 2189, H.R. 261, and H.R. 3617 under a closed rule and provides for one hour of debate and one motion to recommit on each bill. |
| 2026-01-30 | Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 119-472. |
| 2026-01-30 | Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 403. |
| 2025-11-20 | Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held |
| 2025-11-20 | Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 18 - 8. |
| 2025-11-18 | Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held |
| 2025-03-18 | Introduced in House |
| 2025-03-18 | Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. |