GUARD Act

U.S. Congress · HR2978 · Reported

What the bill says

HR2978 · U.S. Congress · Reported

Introduced 2025-04-21. Latest action: Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 119-709, Part I.

View on Congress.gov →

Summary (plain-language)

Guarding Unprotected Aging Retirees from Deception Act of 2026 or the GUARD Act of 2026 This bill allows state, local, and tribal law enforcement agencies and grantees that receive funds from certain law enforcement grant programs to use the funds to investigate general financial fraud, elder financial fraud, and pig butchering. Pig butchering refers to a confidence and investment fraud in which a victim is gradually lured into transferring increasing amounts of money, generally in the form of cryptocurrency, into a fake virtual investment. The bill allows federal law enforcement agencies to assist state, local, and tribal law enforcement agencies and fusion centers in the use of tracing tools for blockchain and related technology tools. Finally, the bill requires the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) to report on efforts to combat general financial fraud, elder financial fraud, pig butchering, and scams, including an evaluation of any legislative recommendations to improve the efforts. The bill also requires FinCEN to report on the state of general financial fraud, elder financial fraud, pig butchering, and scams in the United States, including trends in the crimes.

Sponsors

Text versions

  • Introduced in House — 2025-04-21 — XML

What analysts say

CBO cost estimates

  • H.R. 2978, GUARD Act of 2026 — 2026-06-18
    H.R. 2978 would expand existing grant programs and allow state, local, and tribal law enforcement agencies to use grants from the Department of Justic…

    H.R. 2978 would expand existing grant programs and allow state, local, and tribal law enforcement agencies to use grants from the Department of Justice (DOJ) to investigate financial fraud and scams. Under the bill, agencies could use grants to hire and train analysts and agents, obtain software and other analytical tools, and provide training on best practices related to fraud investigation. H.R. 2978 would require DOJ to report to the Congress annually on the activities supported by the new grants authorized by the bill. The bill also would require the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), in consultation with DOJ and federal banking regulators, to report to the Congress on the government’s efforts to combat financial fraud. Finally, H.R. 2978 would require FinCEN to report to the Congress regarding trends in those crimes.

    The estimated budgetary effects of the legislation are shown in Table 1. The costs of the legislation fall within budget functions 370 (commerce and housing credit) and 750 (administration of justice).

    Using information from DOJ about awards in recent years, CBO expects that about 210 law enforcement agencies would receive grants under the bill and that each grant would cost about $225,000, on average. Based on the historical spending pattern for similar programs, and accounting for anticipated inflation, CBO estimates that implementing H.R. 2978 would cost $128 million over the 2026-2031 period, assuming appropriation of the necessary amounts. Based on the costs of similar activities, CBO estimates that the bill’s reporting requirements would cost FinCEN and DOJ less than $500,000 over that same period.

    Table 1.

    Estimated Budgetary Effects of H.R. 2978

    By Fiscal Year, Millions of Dollars

    2026

    2027

    2028

    2029

    2030

    2031

    2026-2031

    Increases in Spending Subject to Appropriation

    Estimated Authorization

    24

    49

    50

    51

    52

    53

    279

    Estimated Outlays

    *

    6

    15

    26

    37

    44

    128

    CBO also estimates that enacting H.R. 2978 would increase direct spending and reduce revenues by less than $500,000 in every year and over the 2026-2036 period. The effect on the deficit would not be significant.

    * = between zero and $500,000.

    Enacting H.R. 2978 would require several financial regulators whose operating costs are classified as direct spending to report to the Congress. Because some of those regulators collect fees from financial institutions to offset their operating costs, CBO estimates that the bill’s reporting requirements would, on net, increase direct spending by less than $500,000 over the 2026-2036 period.

    Additionally, CBO expects that the Federal Reserve would incur costs to comply with the bill’s reporting requirements; those costs reduce remittances to the Treasury, which are recorded in the budget as revenues. Thus, CBO estimates that enacting the bill would decrease revenues by less than $500,000 over the 2026-2036 period.

    If federal financial regulators were to increase annual fees to offset the costs of implementing the provisions in H.R. 2978, the cost of an existing private-sector mandate on entities required to pay those fees would increase as well. CBO estimates that the incremental cost of the mandate would be small and would fall well below the annual threshold established in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) for private-sector mandates ($214 million in 2026, adjusted annually for inflation).

    H.R. 2978 contains no intergovernmental mandates as defined in UMRA.

    Previous CBO Estimate

    On March 27, 2026, CBO transmitted a cost estimate for S. 2544, the GUARD Act, as reported by the Senate Committee on the Judiciary on February 9, 2026. The two bills are similar, and CBO’s estimate of their budgetary effects are the same.

    The CBO staff contacts for this estimate are Jeremy Crimm (for federal costs) and Erich Dvorak (for mandates). The estimate was reviewed by H. Samuel Papenfuss, Deputy Director of Budget Analysis.

    Phillip L. Swagel

    Director, Congressional Budget Office

    Full text from cbo.gov (CBO publications are public domain).

Committee reports

What politicians say

No linked claims or utterances yet — no one on record has cited this measure to justify a public argument.

Action History

DateAction
2026-06-24Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 119-709, Part I.
2026-05-13Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
2026-05-13Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 52 - 0.
2025-04-21Introduced in House
2025-04-21Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Lobbying on this bill

Showing 9 of 9 bill mentions.

Honesty note: each filer below disclosed lobbying on this bill — that much the filing tells us. But the dollar figure is their total lobbying spend for the whole quarter across all their issues, not the amount spent on this bill, and the filing never says whether they supported or opposed it.

Registrant (lobbying firm)ClientPeriodReported quarterly amountExtraction
INDEPENDENT COMMUNITY BANKERS OF AMERICA INDEPENDENT COMMUNITY BANKERS OF AMERICA Q2 2026 $2,170,000 Explicit
CREDIT UNION NATIONAL ASSOCIATION. INC. DBA AMERICA'S CREDIT UNIONS CREDIT UNION NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, INC. DBA AMERICA'S CREDIT UNIONS Q2 2026 $1,290,000 Explicit
CONSUMER BANKERS ASSOCIATION CONSUMER BANKERS ASSOCIATION Q2 2026 $1,030,000 Explicit
AMERICAN FINTECH COUNCIL AMERICAN FINTECH COUNCIL Q2 2026 $110,000 Explicit
CONSUMER BANKERS ASSOCIATION CONSUMER BANKERS ASSOCIATION Q1 2026 $830,000 Explicit
AARP AARP Q1 2026 $3,830,000 Explicit
AARP AARP Q1 2026 $3,830,000 Explicit
INSURED RETIREMENT INSTITUTE INSURED RETIREMENT INSTITUTE Q1 2026 $170,000 Explicit
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION Q1 2026 $950,000 Probable

Source: Senate LDA filings.